GMAT 考满分题库

题库 > 阅读RC > 题目f9gpdk
题目材料
For many years, theoretical economists characterized humans as rational beings relentlessly bent on maximizing purely selfish reward. Results of an experimental economics study appear to contradict this view, however. In the ""Ultimatum Game,"" two subjects, who cannot exchange information, are placed in separate rooms. One is randomly chosen to propose how a sum of money, known to both, should be shared between them; only one offer, which must be accepted or rejected without negotiation, is allowed.

If, in fact, people are selfish and rational, then the proposer should offer the smallest possible share, while the responder should accept any offer, no matter how small: after all, even one dollar is better than nothing. In numerous trials, however, two-thirds of the offers made were between 40 and 50 percent; only 4 percent were less than 20 percent. Among responders, more than half who were offered less than 20 percent rejected the offer. Behavior in the game did not appreciably depend on the players' sex, age, or education. Nor did the amount of money involved play a significant role: for instance, in trials of the game that were conducted in Indonesia, the sum to be shared was as much as three times the subjects' average monthly income, and still responders refused offers that they deemed too small.

All of the following are expressly mentioned in the passage as factors that did not significantly affect players' behavior EXCEPT the

  • Aplayers' level of schooling
  • Bamount of money to be shared
  • Cages of the players
  • Dplayers' professions
  • Egenders of the players
显示答案
正确答案: D

讨论题目 或 发起提问

|

题目讨论

  • 按热度
  • 按顺序

最新提问