题库> 逻辑 CR> CR-0317wk

题目选项分析

A certain mayor has proposed a fee of five dollars per day on private vehicles entering the city, claiming that the fee will alleviate the city's traffic congestion. The mayor reasons that, since the fee will exceed the cost of round-trip bus fare from many nearby points, many people will switch from using their cars to using the bus.

Which of the following statements, if true, provides the best evidence that the mayor's reasoning is flawed?

【选项】The cost of parking fees already makes it considerably more expensive for most people to take a private vehicle into the city than to take a bus.

选项是否正确?

答对用户笔记

Claireyinghaha
1人
Claireyinghaha 2018-10-30 17:58:37
市长的推理:私家车进城费用增加➡️人们不开车从而选择更便宜的公交车。(隐含意思:人们会选择便宜的)
反驳方向:人们不一定就选择便宜的B:停车费用对于开私家车就已经比公交车要花费高了,但人们还是选择开车。说明人们并不一定会选择便宜的方式。
哈哈哈哈哈哈嗝
1人
哈哈哈哈哈哈嗝 2017-08-07 10:52:42
市内的停车费已经很高了,这么高还阻止不了人们开私家车。小小的5块钱进城费更不足为奇了。
frace
1人
frace 2017-05-09 17:59:59
指出这样的a fee of five dollars 对于 switch并没有什么作用 因为高昂的停车费(作为一个policy)就是为了达到这样的一个swich 不管有没有用 再来一个fee这样的policy都是没有用的
飞出鱼缸的猫
0人
飞出鱼缸的猫 2019-12-10 20:41:27
市长的推理:私家车进城费用增加➡️人们不开车从而选择更便宜的公交车。(隐含意思:人们会选择便宜的)
反驳方向:人们不一定就选择便宜的B:停车费用对于开私家车就已经比公交车要花费高了,但人们还是选择开车。说明人们并不一定会选择便宜的方式。
raintsai
0人
raintsai 2019-05-04 17:50:13
Choice B shows that money is not the main reason that people drive their own car into the city because the parking fee is more expensive than raised fee.
jwy200602
0人
jwy200602 2018-05-07 16:51:24
提到了现状 直接反驳了增加费用缓解congestion的可能性
scx_brenda
0人
scx_brenda 2017-08-26 08:27:03
1.就是说现在congestion问题,不是由于私家车多导致的,因为目前的高停车费已经让人们觉得贵了。所以很好的削弱了市场结论的前提(这个城市的congestion是由私家车导致的),从而推翻结论。

题目基本信息

  • 所属科目:逻辑CR
  • 题目来源1:PREP07 Test 1-59
  • 题目来源2:OG18-语文分册-159
难度:中等
Get Microsoft Silverlight