题库> 逻辑 CR> CR-5c16ak

题目选项分析

Some airlines allegedly reduce fares on certain routes to a level at which they lose money, in order to drive competitors off those routes. However, this method of eliminating competition cannot be profitable in the long run. Once an airline successfully implements this method, any attempt to recoup the earlier losses by charging high fares on that route for an extended period would only provide competitors with a better opportunity to undercut the airline's fares.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

【选项】Airline executives generally believe that a company that once underpriced its fares to drive away competitors is very likely to do so again if new competitors emerge.

选项是否正确?

答对用户笔记

桥本环奈心一点哦
0人
桥本环奈心一点哦 2023-10-06 14:30:25
new competitors是区分BD的关键。
D只说了被挤走的老对手的策略,没有考虑新的对手。
B说generally代表新老对手都知道打不赢价格战。
你的小宝贝0
0人
你的小宝贝0 2018-05-08 22:39:39
认为那些通过降价竞争的公司很可能在来一次降价策略,所以不敢去竞争,正确
eio
0人
eio 2017-12-01 11:38:54
the argument rests on the premise that, once the leading airline raises its prices back up to \'normal\' higher levels, other airlines will jump right back into the fray. therefore, choice b is correct: it states that other airlines are likely to continue to stay away, even after the big mean price-cutting airline raises its prices back up. (if their executives believe that \'big air\'。从竞争对手的角度说明,竞争对手不会选择继续跟这样一家大价格战的公司竞争了。削弱可以从原公司:继续打价格战 和 竞争对手:不打价格战 的角度来说。

题目基本信息

  • 所属科目:逻辑CR
  • 题目来源1:PREP07 Test 2-15
难度: 难
Get Microsoft Silverlight