that were cut不如直接done做后置定语简洁,可省略that were;evidence后面要跟同位语从句来说明evidence的具体内容,而【evidence for】后面是要跟某个theory或idea来表达evidence支持该theory或idea的;平行结构:simultaneous(ly) with 与 independent(ly) ofwere arising:时态有误
3人
米灰2018-07-17 18:12:07
evidence for+具体理论/idea (这个evidence支撑的),通常为一个名词。i.e. evidence for evolution
evidence + that + 同位语从句 解释的是evidence 的内容
0人
学员vAx6el2024-06-26 08:42:22
that were cut 不简洁
0人
caseyxiao2023-03-24 20:27:45
that were cut 和 that were arising是不必要的,冗余。
0人
学员Nzfom62021-11-04 11:24:44
that were cut不如直接done做后置定语简洁,可省略that were
0人
huilinshi4502021-10-05 08:24:10
that were cut不如直接done做后置定语简洁,可省略that were
0人
chris3282021-08-26 22:21:11
evidence for 加个名词,不要加句子
0人
学员r20cUY2021-04-06 11:47:02
hat were cut不如直接done做后置定语简洁,可省略that were;evidence后面要跟同位语从句来说明evidence的具体内容,而【evidence for】后面是要跟某个theory或idea来表达evidence支持该theory或idea的;平行结构:
0人
holl0w2021-03-10 15:12:48
evidence for+具体理论/idea (这个evidence支撑的),通常为一个名词。i.e. evidence for evolution
evidence + that + 同位语从句 解释的是evidence 的内容