题库> 逻辑 CR> CR-ec102k

题目选项分析

Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska's government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five. Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government's plan is obviously working.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

【选项】Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.

选项是否正确?

答对用户笔记

陈书睿
1人
陈书睿 2017-04-03 01:17:42
这个选项表示其实只是将其他的存款转移到了这个存款中去,没有增加总的存款量
laura120
0人
laura120 2021-12-11 01:22:57
b選項之中,說的是長期免稅存款的存戶不會被吸引,但是它無法否定「特別存款的總額是增加的」代表「更多儲金」。d選項的意思就是「挖東牆補西牆、左手倒到右手」,特別存款中大量的儲金如果是由原本別的地方的儲金轉過來的話,
那麼當地儲金的總額不一定會增加,也就否定了結論。
天妇罗24
0人
天妇罗24 2017-09-25 11:24:26
!不能用做过的题套用在新的题上,每道题都要完整地走一遍理解程序。
果:增加储蓄的钱。前提是钱已经增多,那就说明肯定是CQ➡️,很可能是银行直接放过来的。
不能在没看完的情况下就排除选项,D中的long term正是CQ方向。

题目基本信息

  • 所属科目:逻辑CR
  • 题目来源1:GWD-45
难度: 难
Get Microsoft Silverlight