A:
- "Influential on" is bad idiomatic usage.
- "That included" can't follow a comma, and, even if you remove the comma, the meaning is absurd (the implication would be that Elvis and Jerry composed part of the anatomy of many different musicians).C:
- "Was influential to" is at best awkward.
- See A for discussion of "that included."
- "Significantly" should come before "different."
- "In comparison to" is redundant because the sentence already says "different."D:
- See above for "influential to."
- The wording of this choice implies that bluegrass artists aren't musicians (skeleton sentence: "BM, whose stuff influenced lots of bluegrass artists, also inspired many musicians.")
- "The music of whom" is wordy ("whose music" is better).
- "Differed when compared to" is redundant - and it's an incorrect interpretation (literally, it means that the music was only 'different' when someone was actively comparing it to some other music).E:
- "That of his own" is redundant (and incorrect, because it literally means "Bill Monroe's music's music").
2人
三条汶2017-11-22 15:53:04
没划线的句子,主语是repertory (s)views on(v)musical collaboration (o)
and 平行结构的标志,前面有逗号,表示vocal style不是musical collaboration的并列,而是两个句子的并列,所以后面的句子主语为vocal style,谓语动词were ,主谓不一致,所以排除所有were选项的答案。选项A
1.主谓不一致
2. 出现了run on,were influenced···was also
1人
瑩妹妹2018-06-27 05:02:22
对于五个选项,只有B是主动影响,其他都是被动,确定了B没有语法问题之后,可以直接选上了。
1人
rtyjj2017-11-15 07:05:53
was also an inspiration 应该用复数
that不能非限定性修饰
0人
gmat720lhk2021-10-06 17:26:23
用更直接的错误排除,that不能指代人,that不能指代人。
0人
zachariahx2021-07-20 13:50:31
that 不能引导非限定性定语从句
只有which 和 as 可以引导非限定性定语从句
0人
lydia10542020-12-27 18:15:24
that 不可用於指人
0人
四战7402020-12-03 18:06:05
1. Bill 是 inspiration 逻辑语义错误
2. that 不能引导 non-essential modifier 人应该用 who