应版权方要求,不支持在线看题功能,感谢您的理解。
historians:during war alliance between unions and AAC- advanced civil rights
而在postwar期间 是由于demise of alliance 导致了错失 civil movement的机会
因此可以看出 historians在during期间是支持unions和AAC的关系是一个同盟关系至于战后联盟瓦解了两者的关系没有详谈但估计也不是很好
Scholars:organized labor(=unions)all along defend white relative to AA
可以看出scholar认为unions一直是对AA有偏心的 不管是战争中还是战后
那至于问题问的是两者不同之处 那很明显是在during期间 对于union和AA关系看法的不同
我觉得难点是这句话,“Other scholars, however, have portrayed organized labor as defending all along the relatively privileged position of White workers relative to African American workers. ”。
翻译成中文就是“ 然而,其他学者将有组织的劳动描述为白人工人相对于非裔美国工人的相对特权地位。” (这句英文我看了好几遍都看不懂) 说明2战的时候工会跟美国黑人关系一点都不好, 正好与前一句的“rise to a dynamic wartime alliance between trade unions and the African American community,”相反。 也就佐证了 选项C的正确性
To attack a passage, one can use help from using Headline Highlights.
P1: Hist: US condition in WW2 led to alliance (UNION + Af-Am comm.)
Alliance disappeared - bad to civil right movement
Sch: UNION is pro white all along
P2: UNION has 2 choices: stay same or inclusion ideal
UNION rep say inclusion ideal but practices the other
Movement after WWII forced union to straight out dilemma
Disagreem