题库> 逻辑 CR> CR-72gdik

题目选项分析

Politician: Hybrid cars use significantly less fuel per kilometer than nonhybrids. And fuel produces air pollution, which contributes to a number of environmental problems. Motorists can save money by driving cars that are more fuel efficient, and they will be encouraged to drive hybrid cars if we make them aware of that fact. Therefore, we can help reduce the total amount of pollution emitted by cars in this country by highlighting this advantage of hybrid cars.

Which of the following, if true, would most indicate a vulnerability of the politician's argument?

【选项】People with more fuel-efficient cars typically drive more than do those with less fuel-efficient cars.

选项是否正确?

答对用户笔记

学员pEQUYe
1人
学员pEQUYe 2020-07-20 20:04:46
用这个车省油(平均值)
会减少污染(总量)
选择:用这个车省油但跑的多(数量)不一定能达到总量小
学员Q9BsSG
0人
学员Q9BsSG 2023-10-08 20:25:27
人们去开省油车比不开省油车的人次数会多,所以还是会造成环境影响,削弱
lucinda886
0人
lucinda886 2022-06-01 14:03:05
选项的意思是,开节能车的人,比开不节能的车的人,开车的次数更多。文章的推理在与,单辆节污染少,所以总污染量减少,但是忽略了总量=单位数量 * 总数量。所以这个选项能够削弱。且这是一段手段目的型的文章,要削弱,方向一般有说明手段不可行,手段有副作用,手段执行有难度。这个选项说明了手段的副作用。
学员ikjKSM
0人
学员ikjKSM 2021-12-02 21:07:11
因为节能,比油车便宜,所以司机舍得开,因此开得比油车多,所以达不到环保效果
大爱我家猪加油
0人
大爱我家猪加油 2019-07-16 20:47:33
A.总消耗量=单位距离消耗量*距离 因此即便单位能源更节省,但行驶路程相比不节能的车更长,总消耗量会一样甚至更多

题目基本信息

  • 所属科目:逻辑CR
  • 题目来源1:OG16-63
  • 题目来源2:OG17-600
  • 题目来源3:OG18-600
  • 题目来源4:OG19-599
  • 题目来源5:OG20-687
  • 题目来源6:OG2022-737
难度:中等
Get Microsoft Silverlight